George Washington University Among the more concerning campuses, reports noted antisemitic graffiti, vandalism, and rhetoric praising extremist violence. The low grade underscores continued risks and inadequate institutional oversight. D GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Princeton University During the review period, Princeton saw antisemitic graffiti, harassment, and rhetoric praising extremist violence. The D-grade reflects ongoing danger and a campus failing to hold perpetrators accountable. D PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Johns Hopkins University Johns Hopkins reports highlighted antisemitic vandalism, threats, and rhetoric promoting extremist violence. The low grade points to persistent dangers and inconsistent institutional response. D JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY Georgetown University Georgetown incidents include antisemitic graffiti, vandalism, and threats or harassment of Jewish students. The grade reflects ongoing dangers to Jewish students and uneven institutional oversight. D GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY Rutgers University In 2025, Rutgers faced antisemitic incidents, including hostile conditions for Jewish students, a lecturer making antisemitic statements, and the student government rejecting the IHRA definition. The campus climate remains hostile and unwelcoming for Jewish students. D RUTGERS UNIVERSITY Middlebury College Middlebury College reports documented antisemitic graffiti, harassment, and rhetoric that appeared to endorse extremist violence. The low grade reflects continued threats and a lack of consistent campus intervention. D MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE SCHOOL GRADES